About Me

My photo
This blog is named after one of my poems. Even thought its not the best of the lot, I just fell in love with those words- The Psyche Unknown...

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Disguising my India...

This topic has been fairly running in my mind for quite some time and a recent conversation has pushed me into writing this pronto. I don't know if anyone will feel offended after reading this, but if you do, you must understand that I am just expressing concern over an issue that ought to be given a thought, rather solved soon pending which the impact in future will be significant in an awry way.

An acquaintance here today who has visited India couple of times was recounting his experiences and as with any foreigner he started off with the “quantity of spice in food” to bad roads to unbearable traffic to India's growth. I was quite used to explaining people about the first three. But the last topic hit me hard because I realized I did not know answers to the questions that surfaced in the discussion. He was being very polite with curiosity but I found myself in a web that I couldn't clamber out of easily. It slowly dawned, 'Growth' is the answer to so many of India's problems today and will probably be in future too.

Its nice to know we are growing in all spheres-scientific, economic social etc., surpassing all boundaries and gaining new heights with every step we take. But there is growth in one particular field which is often overseen, in most families neglected. I am talking about the population growth. Why do we Indians forget that we are expanding beyond the point of explosion and still procreate even after a healthy beautiful child was conceived earlier? I can understand if this was the case with the previous generation. Still in the 70's-80's or even early 90's population wasn't much of a threat. But what is wrong with the current highly-qualified generation who has seen the world, understands the threats to want more of their own gene pool bobbling in front of their eyes?! Many couples argue that its the elderly (who have already grandparented more than once, considering the count they themselves were responsible for) in the families requesting for new products to be manufactured and supplied so that they can spend their last days playing with them! And no, it cannot be brought off a shelf, it has to be made in-house! While hundreds of thousands of kids lay orphaned in the direst of conditions, the influx of those children is increasing who really have little or no clue of the imminent risk they are running into.

Procreation and variation in gene pool is very much necessary to continue the species, to carry forth the name, different traditions, culture, knowledge, heritage and in some cases businesses. But considering that the birth rate is about 25% while the death rate is about 9% for every 1000 people, doesn't it become the responsibility of every citizen to ensure that we have only what we will need for progress in harmony than have a surplus of human resource who fight for every other available seed for sustenance? Consider this, you and me will not have trouble during our life time, its the next generation that is going to suffer. If you have been in a city like Bangalore you will see the development and the increase in population over the last ten years grow manifold and you will also notice/complain about how there is no more place, how things are getting expensive, how there is not enough land up for purchase and definitely not many houses that can be bought. Everyone needs it. Everyone is in a pursuit of house, vehicles(atleast two-wheelers if not four) and being Indians, gold amongst the materialistic entities while simultaneously demand for lesser traffic, cleaner air, more space and what not! How on earth will anyone be able to provide all these if the population just keeps sky-rocketing? The usable land remains the same unless of course you start adding rural areas to the city limits as well. In that case if the arable lands and farmers are forced into different careers, then how can the food demands be met for a higher number of people?

Big families don't necessarily lead to a healthy, bonding society. I once lived across a family which probably had a sole goal in life-to populate the world. In pursuit of it, every year came a new entree into the market. And being rich as they were, they celebrated every one of the joyous occasions marking the successful anniversaries of each product. Of the many ignored birthday invites (to save my money on gifts) I picked up one random nipper who was unlucky enough to be graced by my satire presence. I had gone there just to count the total head. It was impossible. The gradient in looks and size wasn't that big and I just kept counting all of them over and over again. The house ran in chaos while the matriarch of the house just sat in her fat armchair overlooking her tired production unit(read daughter in law) who herself was haplessly gazing at her troublesome products. There really wasn't any enthusiasm in her eyes. Of course, if every month you had a commodity demanding cake and balloons, would you be spreading joy? Yes, I don't like calling them children. It seemed to me like a production house for humans where the machines in the production line never found rest time! Either the couple hadn't heard of birth control methods or they had some superficial dreams and beliefs. Just think, if the parents cant spend enough time on each of their kids what is the point of bringing them into existence?Its bad enough that we have a terrible percentage of unproductive, inefficient people, do we need more of them? Atleast that section of people is ok, do we need sociopaths or psychopathic additions to the society? Oh, this applies to a 2-children family as well. I have known instances where one of them is ignored, so that the other gets the light of the hour. Seriously, is that why the seconders are conjured?

The main detrimental aspect is the Indian mentality of conservative shyness when it comes to birth control methods. Many couples claim some of their conceptions is because of an “accident” where the doctor's prescribed pills did not work exactly the way it should have on the woman's reproductive system. How difficult is it for men to take one step forward to buy some protection? Why is it acceptable rather expected for a woman to take B.C pills prescribed by a doctor that involves so much risk and money, not to mention adverse effects on health, while all men have to do is buy a pack around the corner of the street? One of my friend was telling me how condoms are available for as low as Rs. 3 (its true, check the websites!) and as discreet as in places like the gents restrooms of malls and showrooms. Is it really “Oh what will the other person think of me if I buy this?” or is it just plain ignorance combined with arrogance?  Its the tradition of keeping it under covers as though its some pagan ritual that Indians should really rise out of. 

We are not far behind..
Chinese who are currently world no. 1 in terms of population, have some policies that they strictly follow. One child per family, More than that? pay more taxes! And to see, its working out efficiently. At the present rate, we will surpass the Chinese by 2030. In India too, if they can bring some policies like that AND FOLLOW THEM strictly, then we can keep a check on our population too and thus ensuring equal opportunities for all in every matter. This was what was going on in my mind when my western acquaintance asked why we don't have a policy to curb this godforsaken rate of increase! I told him that we do have a 2 children policy and his immediate question was, what happens if you have the third one? I did not have an answer because nothing happens in India! Why are we so negligent about it? We have all the time to divide states and pay foreigners giant bills to play in some chaotic, senseless tournaments but we don't have time to solve the problems on hand!
A simple policy (This was suggested by the same friend mentioned above and I support)-
One child per family- Reduction in taxes,
One child+an adoption-further reduction in taxes,
More than one-Increase the taxes(by a specific percentage),
No offsprings-Minimum taxes.
No offsprings+adoption-No taxes!

The tax reduction or increase doesn't have to be more, trust me, considering the Indian mentality, people will definitely think for every tiny percent of increase or decrease in their tax slips! The government too can make quite some revenue with it considering that there will be a few nonchalant people and few more idiots who will make up for all the sensible (albeit a few) lot's taxes..If only this was possible somehow..

You could mock me calling me an “outsider” at the present but I am still an Indian and it hurts to know that my country has some shortcomings and that the world knows about it, worse laughs about it. Its even more a fierce battle within when I cannot defend cos we really aren't working on solving it. If we were making an effort then I could proudly defend my country's honor in front of the western eye.
But sadly, I did convince them in a totally polar approach (by pointing out the human resources and potential because of the increase; the marquee of Indians covering the globe etc.) although it was basically me trying to reaffirm my love for my country by disguising one of its many negative tapers. I am sure many other expats have tidied the crumbles this way which beyond doubt is not a permanent solution for our own good within India and outside too.



Anonymous said...

Hey there... I will be frank. I read your blog for the first time and I am stunned. The kind of language and the emotions you portray in your blogs is seriously ecstatic. I am really happy that someone is doing this from our community. [I am talking about the MVIT community :)]

This blog said everything which was on my mind too.. I had a similar encounter when I came over here and I was unable to counter the complaints of those who have had a bad experience of the place. We eventually landed on the same result... "POPULATION"!!!

I agree with all the points mentioned in the blog. The govt should take some stern steps to curb the exponential growth. I hope that it happens soon or else

Good job swathi... Keep it coming..

Anonymous said...

Hey... sorry about that...

Thats my pseudo name... I am Gaurav Pandey :) Hope u remember me!! :)

aeroyogi said...

Hey Gaurav, of course I remember you! :) thanks a lot for reading and all those compliments.. Its encouraging.. :)

Maruti said...

A good read indeed... It is surely arguable but if I look at my grandpa's generation, then I think the avg. is 4-5 kids per couple... but if I look at my elder bros/sis generation then the avg comes down to 2... there is not even a single example exceeding this avg (remember my frame of reference)... so probably it will get better in future... it surely gonna take time in coping up with what is already done...but probably our generation do understand this !!

aeroyogi said...

I hope so. But I am seeing many of our "elder brother/sister generation" going in for seconds and thirds now. Thats why I felt the need to write it.. :)

Ann said...

first thing--> no u wont be called an 'outsider'! I am wit u, and I knw many our age and those 'nxt in line' wud totally identify wit all tht uve expressed :D

wud it be any good to just brood like rats (& no offence to rats!) at the expense of sustenance & quality of life?? wud we rather hav one child whom we can ensure a bright, confident and healthy future thn hav a whole drill straining resources to meet ends! the choice is obvious!

mor thn anything--> things lik birth control measures and STD checks shud be talked abt btw couples as casually as their other life preferences. culture & other irrelevant crap shud nt be laid block to pragmatic life style choices. i am personally pro-adoption.

today, wher both couples earn, mor thn ever, its necessary to understand tht wt u'r ancestors did does not apply to u. Ur Life and the wellbeing of those you chose to share it with is your responsibility.

really swat, this post ws easy read, wel put n an ice-less way expressing the population blow we face back in india. a fab read! keep em coming :)

aeroyogi said...


Anonymous said...

I must congratulate for such a good piece of writing. Nice job yaar. I'll just share a bit of my opinion on one of the issues mentioned in your writing.

"No offsprings+adoption-No taxes!"... You know what people will do? They'll get orphans in their home and treat them like servants. Thats all. Thats what happens with all the rules in India. They are mutilated and the theme of a law gets disappeared totally. The only point I am trying to make is that we have quite good rules and solutions for all the problems and they well exist within our law system but the problem is associated with IMPLEMENTATION only. We lack the will to implement. Just nice planning and extremely poor implementation. Lack of planning and feedback to ensure things are going in the way they should.

About China's policies, you surely don't want that system in India and neither any of us can tolerate it for a single moment. Talk to any Chinese friend and you will feel that too.

aeroyogi said...

Thanks for the compliments. :) And I'm sorry, Anonymous, who? :P

And I hardly think those with no offsprings would do such a thing cos they know the value of not having a child. May be what you said applies to those who have a child and then still adopt. But ofcourse adoption rules have to be set for that. Even if they didn't and those kids were treated like slaves, atleast they get a better shelter and prevents another addition to the census count! As it is they are in no better condition..
And I completely agree on the part where we lack implementation. And when I mentioned Chinese policies, I meant the implementation part too. I am not saying that we should follow all their rules. They have an effective way to regulate population growth and we could take a cue from it. Of course India will not be able to sustain communist ideas. But as you pointed out, if we follow rules for once like the Chinese then our great plans can work, many issues can be resolved.
And that is for the higher level though, my main focus was on the "ordinary man". If every individual becomes responsible, the nation will fall on the right track on its own. Of course that is also difficult for such a huge country! :( But it has to begin somewhere and where else than home.. :)

Sumeet said...

You are certainly opinionated :)
Although the one child per family concept may indeed serve to keep our population growth within the limits that our environment (and economy) can support, its implementation is certainly not straight forward.

Firstly, in a country where children born in remote villages (or even not-so-remote villages) are not registered, and do not receive a birth certificate, how would this policy be enforced?

Secondly, considering the fact that even though prenatal sex determination and foeticide are outlawed, centers do exist and foeticide continues to occur, why would someone follow such a rule?

Thirdly, between the year 2000 and 2008, India had a cumulative untaxed capital of USD125b flowing abroad. No tax was paid on this income. A considerable part of the population does not pay taxes. A fraction pays taxes at their income source. The remaining evade taxation. How would a tax penalty be imposed on couples with more than one child?

Fourth, Indian adoption laws allow for orphaned children to be adopted by families only when the family has been verified, and there is a reasonable assurance that the child will be assured her constitutional rights, will be nurtured and brought up with care. Adopting a child to receive tax benefits sounds preposterous to me. As someone earlier posted, the child may be ill treated. A roof over the child's head is no compensation for a wholesome childhood.

I think it was in the 1960s, when the US was experiencing a surge in population as well. A policy was implemented to control the population growth. And it worked. The policy didn't put down regulations limiting a family to one child, or anything of the sort.

The government distributed free television sets to couples. THeir research showed that the sudden population growth was largely due to the lack of entertainment amongst masses. :) More recently, a market research firm discovered that interesting late night television programmes have the same effect.

Maybe the solution to the growth problem lies not in implementing flashy policies penalizing couples for procreating, but rather in getting the message across that there aren't resources left to support a surging population.
India is a country of scale. To see effects from a 1 billion strong population, one needs subtle measures, intended to show results over a 20 year timeline.


aeroyogi said...

Well, I did not take into consideration, tens of other problems lapping India when I wrote this. However, for your first point- Forget the villagers, I was talking only about the "highly qualified lot" living in cities, who know the problems and yet aren't serious about it.
I don't see the point in your second one. :(
Third one- Of course, something I overlooked and I agree, it wouldn't work with them.
Fourth-I still stick by my point. A bit of shelter and clothing is always better than nothing. Yes, even if it means the children are treated as slaves.They are really in no better condition as it is!And laws change .. they have to don;t they?
And hmm... the US idea seems cool to me ;) But in India, do you seriously think it is due to lack of entertainment?? I think not for a majority of them..
And I agree on the last part as well. Of course, even in my previous posts, I have mentioned that things cant change all at once but we need to start... atleast now! :)

Thanks for the comments..keep them coming.


Anonymous said...

Very similar.

aeroyogi said...

I'm sorry, Very similar to what??